Chief Justice of Pakistan, Qazi Faez Isa, underscored the importance of exercising caution in religious matters, citing Quranic verses emphasizing freedom of faith. He delivered the judgment while addressing appeals related to a blasphemy case. The petitioner, accused of distributing a proscribed book, faced prolonged incarceration despite exceeding the maximum punishment if found guilty. The Supreme Court ordered his immediate release, criticizing the handling of the case for disregarding legal provisions and constitutional rights. The verdict highlighted the need for reflection on Quranic teachings and adherence to fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.
In a significant judicial pronouncement, Chief Justice of Pakistan, Qazi Faez Isa, cautioned against hasty judgments in religious matters, emphasizing the Quranic principle of freedom of faith. His remarks came during the hearing of appeals concerning a blasphemy case, where the petitioner, Mubarak Ahmed Sami, was accused of distributing a banned book. Despite legal discrepancies and constitutional protections, Sami endured prolonged imprisonment, exceeding the potential punishment if convicted.
CJP Isa, leading a two-judge bench, ordered Sami’s immediate release, criticizing the judicial handling of the case. The verdict highlighted the failure to uphold legal standards and constitutional rights, urging adherence to Quranic teachings and fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. The judgment underscored the importance of judicial prudence and respect for religious liberties, urging reflection on Quranic verses promoting tolerance and non-compulsion in matters of faith.
Moreover, the court rebuked the denial of bail to Sami by lower courts, despite him serving the maximum imprisonment for the alleged offenses. The decision serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s role in upholding justice, safeguarding individual rights, and promoting harmony in society. Through this verdict, CJP Isa reaffirmed the judiciary’s commitment to fairness, highlighting the need for adherence to legal principles and constitutional values in handling sensitive religious cases.
